EU as a science innovator

Powered by the European Research Area

A data-driven look at the EU’s performance in research excellence, research careers and mobility, innovation, and Europe’s strategic position in key technologies.

This report was produced by Elsevier’s Research Networks Analyst Paola Barr during May and October 2025. Other contributors: Federica Rosetta, VP Academic and Public Affairs EMEA; Dr. Max Voegler, VP Global Strategic Networks DACH; Miguel Santinhos, Global Strategic Networks Associate; and Prof. Carlos Henrique de Brito Cruz, SVP Research Networks.

The report was completed on 28 October 2025. Read the full analysis in the report EU as a Science Innovator: Powered by the ERA.

Europe’s path ahead is clear. Recent EU policy initiatives put research, innovation and knowledge circulation at the centre of Europe’s competitiveness, resilience and strategic autonomy. The re-launch of the European Research Area (ERA) frames this ambition as creating a single, borderless market for research and innovation, advancing the Fifth Freedom: the free movement of knowledge, researchers and innovation across Europe.

As policymakers and universities set targets, design new initiatives and reallocate funding in response to economic, geopolitical and societal pressures, this analysis provides a timely, evidence-based overview. It addresses a central question: How does the EU-27 perform in research and innovation compared to the rest of the world, notably the United States and China? This report complements landmark publication such as Align, Act, Accelerate, The Future of European Competitiveness (Mario Draghi), and aligns with the European Commission’s Competitiveness Compass.

Using a variety of indicators, this work maps performance across the ERA’s key pillars – research excellence, research careers and mobility, and innovation – while also examining Europe’s strategic positioning in key technologies. It shows where Europe is strong today, where opportunities lie, and where systemic change may be needed to achieve the ERA’s ambitions.

Research Capacity and Excellence

Europe’s ability to maintain a leading position in an increasingly competitive research landscape depends on both the excellence of its research and the ability of that research to have broad impact in science, society and industry.

Global research is dominated by three players: China, the EU27, and the United States. China is now the largest single contributor to research, slightly ahead of the EU27, while the United States produces roughly three-quarters of China’s output. At aggregated level, the EU27 and China perform at similar citation-impact levels, while the United States continues to surpass both.

The European Research Area — here defined as the EU27 together with the countries associated to Horizon Europe — accounts for 37% of world article share, making it the largest collaborative research area globally. Associated countries such as the UK, Switzerland, Norway, South Korea and Canada (which have been selected for this report) add strategic capacity and extend Europe’s scientific reach, reinforcing its ability to compete at scale and sustain high impact.

World article share 2019-2024

Use the legend to filter results | Hover/click on each bubble to see expanded data

Use the legend to filter results

Read the full analysis in the report EU as a Science Innovator: Powered by the ERA.

Global view of discipline strengths

Relative Activity Index (RAI)
The chart shows relative activity index of each discipline for selected countries, meaning the relative share of output in each discipline compared to the global average.

The EU produces more publications than the United States in every major subject area and holds the highest number of publications in Life Sciences and Medicine. China leads in Engineering, Technology and Natural Sciences.

These profiles reflect broader strategic priorities:

  • The EU’s balanced presence across all disciplines;
  • The United States’ stronger focus on Life Sciences & Medicine;
  • China and India’s dominance in Engineering & Technology and Natural Sciences

The EU also demonstrates relatively higher activity in Arts & Humanities than the global average.

Geographical collaboration

Intra-European collaboration remains the backbone of the EU’s international research activity.  In 2024, 37% of all internationally co-authored publications from EU institutions included at least one other Member State — up from 33% in 2000. Collaboration between EU Member States remains the single largest share of the Union’s international research partnerships.

As a 27-member union, the EU naturally leads in international collaboration (43%), surpassing the US (36%) and China (20%). Seven out of every eight EU international papers involve a non-EU partner.

Collaboration with the US has decreased, while collaboration with China, the Middle East, Latin America and Africa has grown rapidly.

Trend of research collaboration partnerships of the EU (since 2000)

Use the dropdown to filter results | Hover/click on each section to see expanded data

Use the dropdown to filter results | Hover/click on each section to see expanded data

The 27 EU member states

Research activity within the EU is shaped by a range of national ecosystems with different levels of output and citation impact.

Germany accounts for 22.4% of EU scholarly output, followed by Italy, France and Spain.

Smaller research-intensive countries—including the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Belgium and Finland—achieve the highest citation impact.

Widening countries such as Malta and Estonia exceed the EU27 average FWCI.

This reflects the diversity of research profiles across the EU, with different Member States contributing in distinct ways to overall output and impact.

The output and FWCI of EU27 countries (2019-2024)

Use the legend to filter results | Hover/click on each section to see expanded data

Read the full analysis in the report EU as a Science Innovator: Powered by the ERA.

"This report is timely. It arrives at a moment when Europe must reflect on the role it wishes to play in the emerging global landscape."

Prof. Josep M. Garrell, President of the European University Association (EUA)

People

Author seniority distribution in G7, plus China, India relative to global average

Comparing to the global average, China shows a particularly high share of early-career authors, while France has the largest share of established-career authors among the G7, followed by Italy and Japan.

Mid-career researchers show similar levels across regions.

Europe maintains a balanced distribution between early-career and senior researchers. Countries such as Germany, Ireland, Austria, and Belgium lead in early–career researcher representation, while France and Slovenia exhibit more senior-heavy profiles. These demographic imbalances highlight the urgency of implementing ERA-wide measures to support researcher mobility, circulation, and return–particularly in so-called “widening countries”.

Researcher mobility in and out of the EU27

Since 1990, the EU27 has experienced a persistent negative net flow of researchers, with more talent leaving the bloc than arriving. 58,437 researchers moved out of the EU27, compared to 39,520 who entered — a 32% loss. For every two researchers entering the EU, three depart.

Mobility patterns remain uneven: widening countries experience more outflows, while research-intensive Member States attract more inflows. Mobility, circulation and return pathways are essential to a fully integrated ERA.

Movement of researchers in and out of the EU27 since 1990

Use the dropdown to filter results | Hover/click on each section to see expanded data

Relative Activity Index (RAI)
Career stages in G7 countries, China and India (2024)

Hover/click on each section to see expanded data

Read the full analysis in the report EU as a Science Innovator: Powered by the ERA.

"Europe’s research system is resilient and globally connected but must continue to renew itself – investing in new generations, closing gender and leadership gaps, and aligning diverse capacities toward shared goals."

Prof. Pawel Rowinski, President of ALLEA, the European Federation of Academies of Sciences and Humanities, and Director of the Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences

Innovation and transfer

Academic-Corporate collaboration and patents-cited research

Academic-corporate collaboration in the EU is above the global average. While the US maintains a higher overall level, many EU countries—especially in Northern Europe, Germany, and France—surpass the US in specific areas of university-industry partnerships.

Patent citations of research highlight the direct contribution of academic work to innovation and commercial applications. China and the US currently lead globally in this metric. The EU as a whole aligns with the global average, though several Member States show notably strong connections between research output and patent activity.

Share of research with Academic-Corporate collaboration (2019-2024)

Share of research cited by patents (2014-2024)

European research from the perspective of industry

The vast majority of corporate research is conducted in collaboration with universities, with approximately 78% of corporate publications featuring academic partners. Within this group, intra-European collaboration is dominant: roughly 56% of EU corporate research publications are co-authored exclusively with EU academic institutions.

There is a wide difference in the level of research activity by corporates. This depends not only on the type of industry and sector, which of course plays a big role, but also on cultural elements, and national policies. Germany, France, and the Netherlands have high industry involvement in scholarly research; some countries show very low activity.

EU27 corporates co-authoring with universities (in % of corp. output.)

Hover/click on each section to see expanded data

Read the full analysis in the report EU as a Science Innovator: Powered by the ERA.

"The report shows where knowledge is best developed, but innovation only materialises when produced at scale and available at affordable prices."

Michiel Scheffer Ph.D, President of the Board of the European Innovation Council (EIC)

EU’s Strategic Positioning in Key Technologies

Research in Key technologies

The EU remains a pivotal global player in strategic fields, holding substantial shares of research in biotechnology, photonics, robotics and space technology. However, competitors — particularly China — are intensifying the race. Putting research and innovation at the heart of Europe’s economy is essential for digital sovereignty, competitiveness and leadership in trustworthy AI.

EU27 size and global shares of research in selected key technologies, and citations levels (FWCI) (2019-2024)

Use the legend to filter results | Hover/click on each section to see expanded data

The EU’s strength lies in drawing on specialised national expertise across Member States and Horizon Europe–associated countries. Its ability to coordinate this expertise through an extensive, high-impact collaboration network remains one of Europe’s most distinctive strategic assets. Sustaining future technological leadership will depend on fully leveraging this network to accelerate innovation, integrate global knowledge and address critical capability gaps.

Relative Activity (RAI) in Research in selected key technologies (2019-2024)

Use the legend to filter results | Hover/click on each section to see expanded data

"The unique value of EU Framework Programmes for R&I must be fully leveraged. Horizon Europe enables multi-country collaboration, scales excellence, and aligns research with strategic priorities in ways national programmes cannot."

Manuel Heitor, Center for Innovation, Tech. and Policy Research, IN+@IST, University of Lisbon, and Chair of High-Level Group of Horizon Europe’s assessment, 2024

Explore SciVal Potential

SciVal offers a comprehensive solution to help research leaders and academic institutions navigate the complexities of the global research landscape.

Research Performance Evaluation: SciVal provides detailed insights into research outputs, enabling institutions to track and analyse their scholarly publications. With UK research witnessing a robust growth, SciVal allows you to benchmark your performance against peers and identify areas of strength and opportunity.

Collaboration Insights: The UK excels in international collaboration. SciVal’s tools enable you to discover potential collaborators worldwide, fostering partnerships that can enhance your institution’s research capabilities and visibility.

Impact Measurement:  SciVal helps you measure the impact of your research initiatives. By analysing citations in patents and policy documents, you can understand how your work influences societal change and contributes to the Sustainable Development Goals.

Customized Reporting: SciVal’s user-friendly interface allows you to create tailored reports that highlight key metrics relevant to your institution’s goals. Whether you’re focusing on industry collaboration or assessing contributions to specific SDGs, SciVal equips you with the necessary data to make informed decisions.

Glossary

Academic-corporate collaboration

In Scopus, institutions are classified into one of four main sectors (Corporate, Academic, Government, and Medical sectors). In this report, academic–corporate collaboration is analysed via the proxy of papers whose authors’ affiliations belong to both the academic and corporate sectors.

Citation

A citation is a formal reference to earlier work made in a paper or patent, frequently to other papers. A citation is used to credit the originator of an idea or finding and is typically used to indicate that the earlier work supports the claims of the work citing it. The number of citations received by a paper from subsequently published papers can be used as a proxy of the quality or importance of the reported research.

International collaboration

International collaboration in this report is indicated by papers with at least two different countries listed in the authorship byline.

Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI)

Field-weighted citation impact (FWCI) is an indicator of mean citation impact and compares the actual number of citations received by a paper with the expected number of citations for papers of the same document type (article, review, or conference proceeding), publication year, and subject area. When the paper is classified in two or more subject areas, the harmonic mean of the actual and expected citation rates is used.

The indicator is therefore always defined with reference to a global baseline of 1.0 and intrinsically accounts for differences in citation accrual over time, differences in citation rates for different document types (e.g., reviews typically attract more citations than research articles), as well as subject specific differences in citation frequencies overall and over time and document types.

Relative Activity Index (RAI)

Relative Activity Index is defined as the share of an entity's publications in a subject relative to the global share of publications in the same subject. A value of 1.0 indicates that an entity's research activity in a field corresponds exactly with the global activity in that field; higher than 1.0 implies a greater emphasis while lower than 1.0 suggests a lesser focus.

Scholarly Output:

Scholarly Output in SciVal indicates the prolificacy of an entity: how many publications does this entity have indexed in Scopus? Scholarly Output is a:

  • Productivity metric
  • Snowball Metric
  • “Power Metric”

SciVal Metric: Scholarly Output - Evolve Support Center

Read the full report for more insights into EU as a science innovator

Would you like to read insights from more countries? Explore other Science Nation reports.

Analytical Services provide actionable, customized research performance and impact analysis –
contact Elsevier.